“We are committed to protecting the data originally owned by individuals (enterprises) and building a decentralized data autonomous world, so as to realize the sharing of data value.” – The first sentence of the JASMY white paper.
Our Commitment
“We are committed to protecting the data originally owned by individuals (enterprises) and building a decentralized data autonomous world, so as to realize the sharing of data value.” – The first sentence of the JASMY white paper.
1. What is Web3.0?
——Some people say that Web 3.0 is an Internet jointly owned by its creators, builders and users. By using tokens and decentralized technology, it aims to overturn centralized intermediaries.
——Some people also briefly divided the development of Web networks according to time and performance:

2005-2020: Web2.0-Read + Write
2020-?: Web3.0-Read+Write+Own
Yahoo’s reporter wrote: “After the Metaverse became popular, Web 3.0 – is the new buzzword to take over the Internet world. Web 3.0, also known as the Decentralized Web, is the third version of the Internet. Improvements to the current Web 2.0 Internet.”
2. The Web3.0 business model is based on data
In fact, many Web3.0 network elements such as decentralized identity, distributed storage, cross-chain, and privacy computing essentially serve “data”, making data a private asset that individuals dare not think about in the past.
Because only when data becomes a private asset, then data generate liquidity will be valuable. Achieving this requires solving two basic problems: data ownership and data identity.
Perhaps you have felt the same way. For example, the recent popular DAO airdrop is generally based on the data history of user wallet address interaction. The data includes gas fees, currency holdings, transfers, pledges, mining and many other dimensions. Individuals own these data, and everyone in the blockchain industry agrees. Just imagine, in the Web2.0 network framework, you cannot get airdrop income because the wallet address (personal identity ID) is only the account of a certain platform, your personal information data does not belong to you, and other people in the network also doesn’t agree with it. And these data will not generate liquidity and income for you, and the platform will be the only one that can use the data.

3. Data Ownership
In the Web2.0 network, whether it is an individual or an enterprise user, their data information is stored on the server provided by the centralized platform. Users must sign an unequal agreement, which means that the centralized platform will use personal (enterprise) data. For individual users, neutral platforms will frantically place ads on you according to your living habits to charge higher fees, regardless of your feelings, Google and Facebook’s annual advertising revenue exceeds 100 billion US dollars, accounting for more than 55% of total global digital advertising revenue.
The Evolution of the Web

After making money by using the user’s data, sometimes accidentally, the user’s information will run naked on the screens around the world; meantime, the company’s secrets are revealing.. Therefore, under the Web2.0 framework, The platform service provider is always the maker of the rules, and users are powerless to resist. What about the value of data? Business models based on personal (enterprise) data are only exploiting users.

Under the Web3.0 network framework, the trend of enterprise DAO is unstoppable. Both enterprises and users will follow unified guidelines, data will be stored in a distributed manner, and data security and ownership will be guaranteed through DID identity and privacy computing technologies. There is also interoperability (data identity). In this way, the business model based on data ownership has unlimited room for imagination.
4. Data Recognition

Of course, DID identity is just a simple case to illustrate the situation. The whole framework system is to be “in a trust-minimized environment, individuals and businesses will be able to interact on a completely new framework without relying on intermediary structures.”
Here is a model case – an asset leasing company has been operating in Japan for many years -and everything is normal. Their business model is well understood, that is, sharing. The revenue of each machine is charged according to a certain percentage. This model has been running for many years, and the local partners have known each other. As a result, the cost of doing business between the two parties is getting lower and lower, and everything is in a virtuous circle. However, Japan’s seemingly smooth business model is utterly untenable in the process of expanding overseas markets.
To operate smoothly in overseas markets, the company has considered three model options:
Option 1, still use the sharing model, take time, and run in one customer by one customer. Obviously, in a country whose culture, philosophy, language, and national conditions are entirely different from Japan, the cost of such a plan in terms of time and financial resources is immeasurable;
Option 2 is to use a fixed-fee model. Not based on the income of each machine, but only charge a fixed fee for each device, which seems reasonable, but for customers, it is impossible to estimate whether the device can bring actual profits, nor believe the profit data provided by the leasing company.
Option 3 is still the mechanism of sharing, installing sensors on each machine, and uploading the data of each machine’s income to the cloud. But the contradiction is because it is a cross-border service and there are multiple layers of intermediaries, the data provided in the end cannot be guaranteed to be accurate, and users still do not trust the company.
The core contradiction of business expansion lies in the estrangement of commercial data between the leasing company and overseas customers. The data of Party A and Party B do not agree with each other, resulting in trust problems. This is a common problem in business models under the Web2.0 framework. Data identification hinders business development.

In the future, you will find that such a similar case is just a microcosm of the Web.3.0 framework. When the Web3.0 network travels a particular scale, as mentioned above, in the scenario ,where everyone uses the same standard ID, when companies and users conduct a series of business activities such as asset transactions, business cooperation, investment, leasing, shopping, etc… Only the A and B parties must disclose the necessary cooperation data, just like the transaction data on the wallet address. Everyone will agree with what is true and cannot be tampered with.

JASMY, a Japanese company that develops and provides data security and sharing services in the IoT era – “Jasmy IoT Platform”. The company’s only token, Jasmy (JMY), is the first Japanese blockchain project approved listed on the Japanese digital currency exchange. It is the first legal and compliant digital currency in Japan. Epoch-making significance.
To gain more information——
Official website:http://www.Jasmy.co.jp
Twitter:https://twitter.com/Jasmy_league
Telegram:https://t.me/OfficialJasmyUniverse
Facebook:https://www.facebook.com/Jasmyleague/
Medium:https://medium.com/Jasmy-league
GitHub:https://github.com/JasmyCoin/JasmyCoin
声明:图文资料来源于网络,不代表币博客的观点和立场,版权归原作者所有,如有侵权请联系删除。